Genomic Profiling for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, Microsatellite Instability, and Mismatch Repair Deficiency Among Patients With Metastatic Colon Cancer
Affiliations
- PMID: 32923867
- PMCID: PMC7448804
- DOI: 10.1200/PO.19.00274
Abstract
Purpose: Genomic testing is recognized in national guidelines as essential to guide appropriate therapy selection in metastatic colorectal cancer. Previous studies report adherence to testing guidelines is suboptimal, but current testing rates have not been assessed. This study reports testing rates in metastatic colon cancer (mCC) for guideline-recommended biomarkers in a US-based population.
Materials and methods: A retrospective review of data extracted from electronic medical records was performed to identify patients with pathologically confirmed mCC and describe patterns of guideline-aligned biomarker testing. Data were extracted from the electronic health records of 1,497 patients treated at 23 practices across the United States. Both community and academic centers were represented.
Results: A total of 1,497 patients with mCC diagnosed between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017 were identified. Guideline-aligned biomarker testing rates for RAS, BRAF, and microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficiency over this study period were 41%, 43%, and 51%, respectively. Patients were more likely to have guideline-aligned testing for RAS and BRAF if they were treated at an academic center, were diagnosed with de novo metastatic disease, and were female. In addition, patients < 65 years of age were more likely to have guideline-aligned RAS testing. Of the 177 patients (12% of cohort) who received anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy, only 50 (28%) had complete guideline-aligned biomarker testing.
Conclusion: Despite guideline recommendations and significant therapeutic implications, overall biomarker testing rates in mCC remain suboptimal. Adherence to guideline-recommended biomarker testing would potentially reduce exposure to expensive and ineffective therapies, resulting in improved patient outcomes.
© 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Conflict of interest statement
The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/po/author-center. Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments). Martin E. GutierrezStock and Other Ownership Interests: Cota Healthcare Honoraria: Foundation Medicine, Guardant Health Consulting or Advisory Role: Exenex Speakers' Bureau: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Eli Lilly Research Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst), Merck (Inst), Incyte (Inst), NextCure (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), GSB Pharma (Inst), Moderna Therapeutics (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Silenseed (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Johnson & Johnson (Inst), MedImmune (Inst), Checkpoint Therapeutics (Inst) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Guardant HealthKristin S. PriceEmployment: Guardant Health, Counsyl Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Guardant Health, CounsylRichard B. LanmanEmployment: Guardant Health, Veracyte Leadership: Guardant Health, Biolase Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Guardant Health, Biolase, Forward Medical Consulting or Advisory Role: Forward Medical Research Funding: Guardant HealthRebecca J. NagyEmployment: Guardant Health Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Guardant HealthIrfan ShahEmployment: Cota Healthcare Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Guardant HealthMichael MulcahyEmployment: Cota HealthcareAndrew D. NordenEmployment: Cota Healthcare, IBM Leadership: Cota HealthcareStuart L. GoldbergEmployment: Cota Healthcare Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Cota Healthcare Research Funding: Celator Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst), Novartis (Inst) No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.
Similar articles
- KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, HER2 and microsatellite instability in metastatic colorectal cancer - practical implications for the clinician.Radiol Oncol. 2019 Sep 24;53(3):265-274. doi: 10.2478/raon-2019-0033.PMID: 31553708 Free PMC article. Review.
- Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: can testing of tumor tissue for mutations in EGFR pathway downstream effector genes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer improve health outcomes by guiding decisions regarding anti-EGFR therapy?Genet Med. 2013 Jul;15(7):517-27. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.184. Epub 2013 Feb 21.PMID: 23429431
- A retrospective observational study of clinicopathological features of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.BMC Cancer. 2015 Apr 11;15:258. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1276-z.PMID: 25886136 Free PMC article.
- Metastatic colorectal cancer treatment patterns according to kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog genotype in U.S. Community-based oncology practices.Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2014 Sep;13(3):178-84. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jun 23.PMID: 25065655
- KRAS Testing for Anti-EGFR Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence-Based and Economic Analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(25):1-49. Epub 2010 Dec 1.PMID: 23074403 Free PMC article.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario