Comparison of BRAF Mutation Screening Strategies in a Large Real-Life Series of Advanced Melanoma Patients
Affiliations
- PMID: 32751423
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082430
Abstract
Malignant melanoma (MM) is one of the deadliest skin cancers. BRAF mutation status plays a predominant role in the management of MM patients. The aim of this study was to compare BRAF mutational testing performed by conventional nucleotide sequencing approaches with either real-time polymerase chain reaction (rtPCR) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays in a real-life, hospital-based series of advanced MM patients. Consecutive patients with AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) stage IIIC and IV MM from Sardinia, Italy, who were referred for molecular testing, were enrolled into the study. Initial screening was performed to assess the mutational status of the BRAF and NRAS genes, using the conventional methodologies recognized by the nationwide guidelines, at the time of the molecular classification, required by clinicians: at the beginning, Sanger-based sequencing (SS) and, after, pyrosequencing. The present study was then focused on BRAF mutation detecting approaches only. BRAF wild-type cases with available tissue and adequate DNA were further tested with rtPCR (Idylla™) and NGS assays. Globally, 319 patients were included in the study; pathogenic BRAF mutations were found in 144 (45.1%) cases examined with initial screening. The rtPCR detected 11 (16.2%) and 3 (4.8%) additional BRAF mutations after SS and pyrosequencing, respectively. NGS detected one additional BRAF-mutated case (2.1%) among 48 wild-type cases previously tested with pyrosequencing and rtPCR. Our study evidenced that rtPCR and NGS were able to detect additional BRAF mutant cases in comparison with conventional sequencing methods; therefore, we argue for the preferential utilization of the aforementioned assays (NGS and rtPCR) in clinical practice, to eradicate false-negative cases and improve the accuracy of BRAF detection.
Keywords: BRAF; NGS assay; druggable mutations; melanoma; real-time PCR; targeted therapies.
Similar articles
- Prospective evaluation of two screening methods for molecular testing of metastatic melanoma: Diagnostic performance of BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry and of a NRAS-BRAF fully automated real-time PCR-based assay.PLoS One. 2019 Aug 15;14(8):e0221123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221123. eCollection 2019.PMID: 31415669 Free PMC article.
- Evaluation of a Rapid, Fully Automated Platform for Detection of BRAF and NRAS Mutations in Melanoma.Acta Derm Venereol. 2018 Jan 12;98(1):44-49. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2738.PMID: 28660280
- Comparison of Five Different Assays for the Detection of BRAF Mutations in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Tissues of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma.Mol Diagn Ther. 2017 Apr;21(2):209-216. doi: 10.1007/s40291-017-0258-z.PMID: 28130756
- Evaluation of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF hotspot mutations detection for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using direct DNA pipetting in a fully-automated platform and Next-Generation Sequencing for laboratory workflow optimisation.PLoS One. 2019 Jul 2;14(7):e0219204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219204. eCollection 2019.PMID: 31265477 Free PMC article.
- Molecular diagnosis in type I epithelial ovarian cancer.Ginekol Pol. 2017;88(12):692-697. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2017.0123.PMID: 29303228 Review.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario