lunes, 22 de febrero de 2016

Borrelia miyamotoi and Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis in Ixodes ricinus Ticks, Romania - Volume 22, Number 3—March 2016 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC

Borrelia miyamotoi and Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis in Ixodes ricinus Ticks, Romania - Volume 22, Number 3—March 2016 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC

Volume 22, Number 3—March 2016


Borrelia miyamotoi and Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis in Ixodes ricinus Ticks, Romania

To the Editor: Ixodes spp. ticks are vectors for human and animal pathogens. Ix. ricinus ticks are widely distributed, frequently reported to feed on humans, and the main vector for a large variety of tickborne pathogens (1). The effect of ticks and tickborne diseases on public health, animal health and welfare, and animal production appears to be an increasing global problem, which will lead to considerable economic costs (2).
Borrelia miyamotoi is a spirochete that belongs to the relapsing fever group and causes symptoms similar to those of other relapsing fever group pathogens and Lyme borreliosis, including erythema migrans−like skin lesions (3). The geographic distribution of B. miyamotoi is sporadic; it has been detected in Ixodes spp. ticks in many countries in Europe and in North America and Asia. In Russia, the United States, and recently in the Netherlands, B. miyamotoi was detected in humans and confirmed to cause disease (4,5). In Romania, pathogens that cause Lyme borreliosis and reptile-associated borreliae were identified in different tick populations (6,7). However, no information is available on the presence of relapsing fever group borreliae in this country.
Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum are obligate, intracellular, tickborne pathogens of the family Anaplasmataceae; both are emerging zoonotic agents. Candidatus N. mikurensis causes monocytotropic ehrlichiosis in canids and humans and granulocytic anaplasmosis in humans and domestic animals (8). These 2 pathogens are found throughout Europe in Ix. ricinus ticks (8). A. phagocytophilum has been reported in questing Ix. ricinus ticks, dogs, wild boars, hedgehogs, and tortoises in Romania (9). Recently, Candidatus N. mikurensis was detected in an Ix. ricinus tick that had bitten a human in Romania (10). This recently discovered tickborne agent was shown to be a risk for disease in humans and has been detected in questing Ix. ricinus ticks throughout Europe and in animal tissue samples and human patients (8).
Relapsing fever spirochetes and potential public health risks associated with tickborne pathogens are a serious medical problem. Thus, we assessed the presence of B. miyamotoiA. phagocytophilum, and Candidatus N. mikurensis in questing Ix. ricinus ticks in Romania.
Questing Ix. ricinus ticks were available from previous studies conducted by our research group. A random sampling approach was used as described (7). To detect potentially pathogenic bacteria, 468 questing Ix. ricinus ticks were collected from 4 regions from Romania, randomly selected, and analyzed.
Detection of pathogens was performed by using multiplex quantitative PCRs (qPCRs) specific for the flaB and ospA genes of B. miyamotoi, the msp2 gene of A. phagocytophilum, and the groEL gene of Candidatus N. mikurensis. We used IQ Multiplex Powermix (Bio-Rad, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and a final reaction volume of 20 μL (8). For detection of A. phagocytophilum and Candidatus N. mikurensis, we also performed multiplex qPCR as described (8). For detection of B. miyamotoi, a specific region of the flab gene was targeted by using multiplex qPCR according to a previous described protocol (1). For quality control of qPCRs, we included positive and negative controls. Sequences of qPCR products were analyzed and compared with sequences available in GenBank.
B. miyamotoi was detected in 7 ticks: 2 (1.59%) of 126 males, 2 (0.68%) of 296 females, and 3 (6.52%) of 46 nymphs. A. phagocytophilum was detected in 16 ticks: 1 (0.79%) of 126 males, 11 (3.72%) of 296 females, and 4 (8.70%) of 46 nymphs. Candidatus N. mikurensis was detected in 25 ticks: 5 (3.97%) of 126 males, 18 (6.08%) of 296 females, and 2 (4.35%) of 46 nymphs. Overall prevalences were 1.50% for B. miyamotoi, 3.42% for A. phagocytophilum, and 5.34% for Candidatus N. mikurensis. Prevalences of each pathogen in specific varied by locality (Table). No co-infections were detected.
We analyzed flabmsp2, and groEL gene sequences obtained by qPCR. These sequences showed 99%–100% identities with gene sequences of B. miyamotoi (GenBank accession no. KJ847050), A. phagocytophilum (accession no. KP164415), and Candidatus N. mikurensis (accession no. FJ966365).
In Romania, the density of Ix. ricinus ticks is high and their host diversity is extensive (7). However, data for effects of tickborne pathogens on public health are scarce in this country. In this study, we detected B. miyamotoiA. phagocytophilum, and Candidatus N. mikurensis in questing Ix. ricinus ticks in Romania, which confirms the emerging trend of these pathogens in Europe. Because of the scarcity of information on human infections with these pathogens in Romania, serologic and molecular investigations and their implementation are needed for diagnosis, which might help in assessing the effect of these pathogens on public health.
Zsuzsa KalmárComments to Author , Hein Sprong, Andrei D. Mihalca, Călin M. Gherman, Mirabela O. Dumitrache, Elena C. Coipan, Manoj Fonville, and Vasile Cozma
Author affiliations: University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania (Z. Kalmár, A.D. Mihalca, C.M. Gherman, M.O. Dumitrache, V. Cozma)National Institute of Public Health and Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands (H. Sprong, E.C. Coipan, M. Fonville)


This article was published in the framework of the European Social Fund, Human Resources Development Operational Program 2007−2013 (project POSDRU/159/1.5/S/136893) and EurNegVec COST Action TD1303.
This study supported by grant no. TE 298/2015 from the Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding.


  1. Hansford KMFonville MJahfari SSprong HMedlock JMBorrelia miyamotoi in host-seeking Ixodes ricinus ticks in England. Epidemiol Infect.2015;143:107987DOIPubMed
  2. Jongejan FUilenberg GThe global importance of ticks. Parasitology2004;129(Suppl):S314DOIPubMed
  3. Platonov AEKaran LSKolyasnikova NMMakhneva NAToporkova MGMaleev VVHumans infected with relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia miyamotoi, Russia. Emerg Infect Dis2011;17:181623DOIPubMed
  4. Crowder CDCarolan HERounds MAHonig VMothes BHaag HPrevalence of Borrelia miyamotoi in Ixodes ticks in Europe and the United States.Emerg Infect Dis2014;20:167882DOIPubMed
  5. Fonville MFriesema IHHengeveld PDDocters van Leeuwen AJahfari SHarms MGHuman exposure to tickborne relapsing fever spirocheteBorrelia miyamotoi, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis2014;20:12445.PubMed
  6. Kalmár ZCozma VSprong HJahfari SD'Amico G. Mărcuțan DI, et al. Transstadial transmission of Borrelia turcica in Hyalomma aegyptium ticks. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0115520.
  7. Kalmár ZMihalca ADDumitrache MOGherman CMMagdaş CMircean VGeographical distribution and prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferigenospecies in questing Ixodes ricinus from Romania: a countrywide study. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2013;4:403–8.
  8. Jahfari SFonville MHengeveld PReusken CScholte EJTakken WPrevalence of Neoehrlichia mikurensis in ticks and rodents from north-west Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:74.
  9. Matei IAKalmár ZMagdaş CMagdaş VToray HDumitrache MOAnaplasma phagocytophilum in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks from Romania. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2015;6:408–13.
  10. Andersson MZaghdoudi-Allan NTamba PStefanache MChitimia L. Co-infection with 'Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis' and Borrelia afzelii in an Ixodes ricinus tick that has bitten a human in Romania. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014;5:706–8.


Suggested citation for this article: Kalmár Z, Sprong H, Mihalca AD, Gherman CM, Dumitrache MO, Coipan EC, et al. Borrelia miyamotoi and CandidatusNeoehrlichia mikurensis in Ixodes ricinus ticks, Romania [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 Mar [date cited].

DOI: 10.3201/eid2203.150140

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario