domingo, 6 de noviembre de 2011

BioNews - 'Wrongful life' - the children who sue for being born

'Wrongful life' - the children who sue for being born

31 October 2011
By Dr Lux Fatimathas
Appeared in BioNews 631
Increasing numbers of Israeli children with birth defects are suing medical professionals for failing to detect abnormalities and allowing them to be born, says the New Scientist. The magazine reports that such is the Israeli Government's concern over the rise in 'wrongful life' lawsuits it has launched an investigation into the validity of the claims.

High rates of consanguineous marriage in some traditional Jewish communities have resulted in an increased likelihood of birth defects in the resulting children. For example, ultra-orthodox Jewish communities are commonly associated with having high incidents of Tay-Sachs disease. If both parents are carriers of the faulty gene in this recessive disease, any resulting child would have a one in four chance of having the disease. The Israeli state offers ultrasound scans and genetic tests to couples at risk of passing on a genetic condition and private pre-natal screening is also widely available. Screening can detect potential defects and help determine whether an abortion should be considered due to health reasons.

The term 'wrongful life' refers to circumstances where the parents of a child allege had they known about a severe genetic problem with the fetus they would have elected to terminate the pregnancy. 'Wrongful life' claims are generally brought by the children – or the parents acting on behalf of the children. New Scientist says the Israeli medical profession has estimated there to have been 600 'wrongful life' lawsuits since the first case in 1987.

'There is an entire system fuelled by money and the quest for the perfect baby ', said human rights lawyer Dr Carmel Shalev of the University of Haifa in Israel. 'Everyone buys in to it – parents, doctors and labs. Parents want healthy babies, doctors encourage them to get tested, and some genetic tests are being marketed too early. Genetic testing has enormous benefits but it is overused and misused'.

The psychological implications of the lawsuits on the children concerned have been highlighted by several medical ethicists. 'I find it very difficult to understand how parents can go on the witness stand and tell their children 'it would have better for you not to have been born. What are the psychological effects on the children?' said medical ethicist Professor Rabbi Avraham Steinberg of University Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem. The precise legal basis for the children's claim and the court's approach to calculating damages is not, however, clear.

The ethical issues surrounding a claim for damages caused in utero are, however, controversial. Professor Meir Brezis of Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem writes: 'The expansion of the right to sue because of the birth of a disabled child is encouraging the perception of the disabled as people whose existence should have been prevented'.

Concerns have also been raised over the effect of the increasing number and value of claims against the medical profession. 'Physicians are increasingly practising defensive medicine, and doing a lot of testing', said Rabbi Steinberg. 'But more testing means more false positives – and that means more abortions, because geneticists don't always know if results indicating the possibility of chromosomal abnormalities are meaningful'.

Rabbi Steinberg sits alongside several other medical ethicists and medical malpractice lawyers, on the Matza committee that has been set up by the Israeli Government to investigate the rising number of 'wrongful life' cases.

New Scientist | 26 October 2011
Haaretz | 28 October 2011


08 August 2011 - by Dr Rebecca Hill 
'The age of personalised medicine: genes, privacy and discrimination?' was the last in BioCentre's 2010/2011 symposium series 'Revolution, Regulation and Responsibilities', and promised to 'appraise current developments and consider the current legal and regulatory position for their use before taking time to reflect and assess the future impact on society'...[Read More]
26 July 2008 - by Dr Rachael Panizzo 
The philosopher Robert Nozick introduced the idea of a genetic supermarket in 1974, before the first IVF birth and the era of medical genetics. At the genetic supermarket, he imagined, prospective parents could shop for desired traits, and design a child to their particular specifications. In 'Defending the Genetic Supermarket', Colin Gavaghan explores the ethics underlying the use of assisted reproductive technologies, in particular preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), as well as the cur...[Read More]
28 January 2008 - by MacKenna Roberts 
A couple is suing the staff at an IVF clinic in Australia for negligently failing to detect a gene mutation responsible for a type of inherited cancer they had specifically undergone pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) testing to avoid. The legally unprecedented case could result in one of...[Read More]
08 October 2007 - by Dr Sammy Lee 
Last week, BioNews reported on an ongoing Australian case in which an IVF mother is suing her consultant specialist for negligence concerning the birth of her healthy twins, on the basis of her express wish to have had only a singleton pregnancy and one child. The case has taken on...[Read More]
BioNews - 'Wrongful life' - the children who sue for being born

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario