sábado, 18 de enero de 2014

Infectious Schmallenberg Virus from Bovine Semen, Germany - Volume 20, Number 2—February 2014 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC

Infectious Schmallenberg Virus from Bovine Semen, Germany - Volume 20, Number 2—February 2014 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC


Volume 20, Number 2—February 2014


Infectious Schmallenberg Virus from Bovine Semen, Germany

To the Editor: The teratogenic Schmallenberg virus (SBV) (genus Orthobunyavirus) was detected in bovine semen in a recent German field study (1). Vector-borne transmission byCulicoides spp. biting midges is most common (2), but venereal transmission of SBV might contribute to the spread of this virus to previously unaffected regions. We investigated the infectivity of SBV RNA–positive semen by experimental subcutaneous injection of cattle and interferon α/β receptor–deficient (IFNAR−/−) mice (3).
Thumbnail of Detection of Schmallenberg virus (SBV) RNA and antibodies in serum of 5 of 11 cattle (C) injected with SBV RNA–positive bovine semen (quantification cycle [Cq] values 26.4–36.4). Infectivity was measured by using reverse transcription PCR (Cq), competitive ELISA (% negative control), and serum neutralization test (ND50, serum dilution that caused virus neutralization in 50% of the replicates). RNAemia and seroconversion occurred in C3, injected with pooled semen from bull C (Cq 34.2
Figure. . . Detection of Schmallenberg virus (SBV) RNA and antibodies in serum of 5 of 11 cattle (C) injected with SBV RNA–positive bovine semen (quantification cycle [Cq] values 26.4–36.4). Infectivity was...
Commercially produced semen straws with egg yolk–based diluent were used for the injection of 6- to 9-month-old heifers. The straws originated from 6 semen batches (quantification cycle [Cq] values 26.4–36.4) collected from 6 bulls (designated A–C and E–G) during August and September 2012 (1). To increase the probability of SBV infection of injected cattle, 5 straws of semen (≈220 µL each) from 1 batch from an individual bull were pooled and diluted in minimal essential medium with antibiotics to 4 mL. Six cattle (C1–6) were subcutaneously inoculated, each with a pool from 1 of the 6 bulls. To investigate the infectivity of a single insemination dose (1 straw), 5 cattle (C7–C11) were subcutaneously injected with single straws from bull F that had been confirmed to contain infectious SBV. Serum samples were obtained on several days (Figure), and clinical signs and rectal body temperatures for the injected cattle were monitored daily.
In addition, 20 SBV RNA–positive semen batches (Cq 25.9 to 36.5) collected from 11 bulls (A–K) during August–November 2012 (1) were subcutaneously injected into 40 IFNAR−/− mice (4–6 weeks old). For each batch, 2 mice were each injected with half of a semen straw (80–120 µL). All mice were monitored clinically and weighed daily. Samples of serum, liver, and spleen were harvested immediately after euthanasia at 22 days postinjection (dpi).
All serum samples and organ homogenates were tested for SBV RNA by using small segment–specific quantitative reverse transcription PCR (4). Serum samples were tested for SBV-specific antibodies by using the ID Screen Schmallenberg Virus Competition ELISA (IDvet, Montpellier, France), according to the manufacturer’s instructions; selected serum samples were also tested by neutralization test against an original SBV isolate from Germany, as described (5).
SBV infection was confirmed in 5 of 11 injected cattle: C3, C5, and C9–C11. SBV RNA (Cq 25.0–29.3) was first detected in serum at 3 to 6 dpi and persisted for 2–4 days. Seroconversion occurred at 8–12 dpi (Figure). None of the SBV-infected animals showed obvious clinical signs or fever; this finding is in accordance with reports of subclinical SBV infection in adult cattle (57). Samples from the other 6 cattle and all IFNAR−/− mice had negative results (data not shown).
The 2 infectious semen batches contained moderate (Cq 26.4) or low (Cq 34.2) viral loads of SBV RNA, indicating that a high sensitivity is required for reliable SBV RNA detection in semen samples (1). The onset of SBV infection in the 3 animals injected with single semen straws ranged from 3 to 5 dpi, and not every straw was infectious, although biologic and technical replicates of straws from 1 semen batch showed similar PCR results (data not shown) (1). Possible explanations for differences in the infectivity of individual straws are that the viral RNA load of an SBV-containing straw does not necessarily correlate with infectivity or that the infectivity of 1 straw is lower than the minimal cattle infectious dose for SBV. Cattle might be more susceptible than IFNAR−/− mice to infection, particularly when SBV titers are low or borderline (78). Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that the semen batches tested only in IFNAR−/− mice might be infectious for cattle or that semen samples with higher SBV titers might be infectious in the mice.
We used subcutaneous injection of SBV RNA–positive semen to demonstrate infectivity because this transmission route has a high sensitivity for proving infectivity of SBV-containing samples (7). However, the possibility of intrauterine SBV infection of dams is unknown. Oro-nasal inoculation of 2 calves did not result in SBV infection of the animals (5), which suggests that mucosal in utero infection with SBV-containing semen is unlikely. In contrast, viremia was detected in most cows that were artificially inseminated and simultaneously inoculated in the uterus with cell culture–passaged Akabane virus, a teratogenic orthobunyavirus closely related to SBV (9). Intrauterine lesions caused by insemination or breeding might therefore increase the risk for SBV infection.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that SBV RNA–positive bovine semen could contain infectious SBV. However, the actual risk for transmission of SBV by insemination of dams with SBV-containing semen remains to be evaluated. Although SBV infection of the developing embryo is unlikely, venereal transmission would lead at worst to viremia of the dam, facilitating vector transmission. To prevent venereal SBV transmission, sensitive PCR testing of semen batches from SBV-infected bulls is the method of choice (1,10).
Claudia Schulz1, Kerstin Wernike1, Martin BeerComments to Author , and Bernd Hoffmann
Author affiliations: Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany


We thank Patrick Zitzow and Susanne Zahnow for excellent technical assistance and the staff of the Biosafety Level 3 facility at Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut for their dedicated animal care.
The animal experiments were approved by an independent ethical committee (LALLF 7221.3-1.1-004/12 and LALLF M-V TSD/7221.3-2.5-005/12). This study was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection and the European Union, as outlined in Council Decision 2012/349/EU concerning a financial contribution by the Union for studies of Schmallenberg virus.


  1. Hoffmann BSchulz CBeer MFirst detection of Schmallenberg virus RNA in bovine semen, Germany2012Vet Microbiol. 2013 Sept 12;pii:S0378-1135(13)00439-2. Epub ahead of print.External Web Site IconDOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  2. Conraths FJPeters MBeer MSchmallenberg virus, a novel orthobunyavirus infection in ruminants in Europe: potential global impact and preventive measures. N Z Vet J.2013;61:637 . DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  3. Müller USteinhoff UReis LFHemmi SPavlovic JZinkernagel RMFunctional role of type I and type II interferons in antiviral defense. Science1994;264:191821 . DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  4. Bilk SSchulze CFischer MBeer MHlinak AHoffmann BOrgan distribution of Schmallenberg virus RNA in malformed newborns. Vet Microbiol2012;159:2368 . DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  5. Wernike KEschbaumer MSchirrmeier HBlohm UBreithaupt AHoffmann BOral exposure, reinfection and cellular immunity to Schmallenberg virus in cattle. Vet Microbiol2013;165:1559 . DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  6. Hoffmann BScheuch MHöper DJungblut RHolsteg MSchirrmeier HNovel orthobunyavirus in cattle, Europe, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis2012;18:46972 . DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  7. Wernike KEschbaumer MBreithaupt AHoffmann BBeer MSchmallenberg virus challenge models in cattle: infectious serum or culture-grown virus? Vet Res2012;43:84DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  8. Wernike KKohn MConraths FJWerner DKameke DHechinger STransmission of Schmallenberg virus during winter, Germany. Emerg Infect Dis2013;19:17013 . DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  9. Parsonson IMDella-Porta AJSnowdon WAO’Halloran MLThe consequences of infection of cattle with Akabane virus at the time of insemination. J Comp Pathol.1981;91:6119 . DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon
  10. van Oirschot JTBovine herpesvirus 1 in semen of bulls and the risk of transmission: a brief review. Vet Q1995;17:2933 . DOIExternal Web Site IconPubMedExternal Web Site Icon


Suggested citation for this article: Schulz C, Wernike K, Beer M, Hoffmann B. Infectious Schmallenberg virus from bovine semen, Germany [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis [Internet]. 2014 Feb [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2002.131436External Web Site Icon
DOI: 10.3201/eid2002.131436
1These authors contributed equally to this article.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario