domingo 29 de enero de 2012

Breast Cancer Prognosis in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Muta... [J Clin Oncol. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI

J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan 1;30(1):19-26. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
Breast Cancer Prognosis in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: An International Prospective Breast Cancer Family Registry Population-Based Cohort Study.
Goodwin PJ, Phillips KA, West DW, Ennis M, Hopper JL, John EM, O'Malley FP, Milne RL, Andrulis IL, Friedlander ML, Southey MC, Apicella C, Giles GG, Longacre TA.
SourceMSc, Mount Sinai Hospital, 1284-600 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X4; pgoodwin@mtsinai.on.ca.

Abstract
PURPOSE To compare breast cancer prognosis in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with that in patients with sporadic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS An international population-based cohort study was conducted in Canada, the United States, and Australia of 3,220 women with incident breast cancer diagnosed between 1995 and 2000 and observed prospectively. Ninety-three had BRCA1 mutations; 71, BRCA2 mutations; one, both mutations; 1,550, sporadic breast cancer; and 1,505, familial breast cancer (without known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation). Distant recurrence and death were analyzed. Results Mean age at diagnosis was 45.3 years; mean follow-up was 7.9 years. Risks of distant recurrence and death did not differ significantly between BRCA1 mutation carriers and those with sporadic disease in univariable and multivariable analyses. Risk of distant recurrence was higher for BRCA2 mutation carriers compared with those with sporadic disease in univariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.63; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.60; P = .04). Risk of death was also higher in BRCA2 carriers in univariable analysis (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.86; P = .01). After adjustment for age, tumor stage and grade, nodal status, hormone receptors, and year of diagnosis, no differences were observed for distant recurrence (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.61; P = 1.00) or death (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.79; P = .64). CONCLUSION Outcomes of BRCA1 mutation carriers were similar to those of patients with sporadic breast cancer. Worse outcomes in BRCA2 mutation carriers in univariable analysis seem to reflect the presence of more adverse tumor characteristics in these carriers. Similar outcomes were identified in BRCA2 carriers and those with sporadic disease in multivariable analyses.
PMID:22147742[PubMed - in process]
Breast Cancer Prognosis in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Muta... [J Clin Oncol. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI

Association Between BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations and Survival in Women With Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, January 25, 2012, Bolton et al. 307 (4): 382 — JAMA

Association Between BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations and Survival in Women With Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

  1. Kelly L. Bolton, PhD;
  2. Georgia Chenevix- Trench, PhD;
  3. Cindy Goh, BA;
  4. Siegal Sadetzki, MD, MPH;
  5. Susan J. Ramus, PhD;
  6. Beth Y. Karlan, MD;
  7. Diether Lambrechts, PhD;
  8. Evelyn Despierre, MD;
  9. Daniel Barrowdale, BSc;
  10. Lesley McGuffog;
  11. Sue Healey, BSc;
  12. Douglas F. Easton, PhD;
  13. Olga Sinilnikova, PhD;
  14. Javier Benítez, PhD;
  15. María J. García, PhD;
  16. Susan Neuhausen, PhD;
  17. Mitchell H. Gail, MD, PhD;
  18. Patricia Hartge, ScD;
  19. Susan Peock, PhD;
  20. Debra Frost, ONC;
  21. D. Gareth Evans, MBBS, MRCP, MD, FRCP;
  22. Rosalind Eeles, PhD, MA, FRCP, FRCR;
  23. Andrew K. Godwin, PhD;
  24. Mary B. Daly, MD, PhD;
  25. Ava Kwong, MBBS, FRCS;
  26. Edmond S. K. Ma, MD;
  27. Conxi Lázaro, PhD;
  28. Ignacio Blanco, MD, PhD;
  29. Marco Montagna, PhD;
  30. Emma D'Andrea, MD, PhD;
  31. Maria Ornella Nicoletto, MD;
  32. Sharon E. Johnatty, PhD;
  33. Susanne Krüger Kjær, MD, DMSc;
  34. Allan Jensen, PhD;
  35. Estrid Høgdall, PhD;
  36. Ellen L. Goode, PhD;
  37. Brooke L. Fridley, PhD;
  38. Jennifer T. Loud, DNP;
  39. Mark H. Greene, MD;
  40. Phuong L. Mai, MD;
  41. Angela Chetrit, MSc;
  42. Flora Lubin, MSc;
  43. Galit Hirsh-Yechezkel, PhD;
  44. Gord Glendon, MSc;
  45. Irene L. Andrulis, PhD;
  46. Amanda E. Toland, PhD;
  47. Leigha Senter, MS;
  48. Martin E. Gore, MBBS, PhD, FRCP;
  49. Charlie Gourley, PhD, FRCP;
  50. Caroline O. Michie, MD;
  51. Honglin Song, PhD;
  52. Jonathan Tyrer, PhD;
  53. Alice S. Whittemore, PhD;
  54. Valerie McGuire, PhD;
  55. Weiva Sieh, MD, PhD;
  56. Ulf Kristoffersson, MD, PhD;
  57. Håkan Olsson, MD, PhD;
  58. Åke Borg, PhD;
  59. Douglas A. Levine, MD;
  60. Linda Steele, BS;
  61. Mary S. Beattie, MD, MAS;
  62. Salina Chan, BSc;
  63. Robert L. Nussbaum, MD;
  64. Kirsten B. Moysich, PhD;
  65. Jenny Gross, MPH;
  66. Ilana Cass, MD;
  67. Christine Walsh, MD;
  68. Andrew J. Li, MD;
  69. Ronald Leuchter, MD;
  70. Ora Gordon, MD, MS;
  71. Montserrat Garcia-Closas, MD, DrPH;
  72. Simon A. Gayther, PhD;
  73. Stephen J. Chanock, MD;
  74. Antonis C. Antoniou, PhD;
  75. Paul D. P. Pharoah, BM, BCh, PhD
  76. for the EMBRACE, kConFab Investigators, and The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network
[+] Author Affiliations
  1. Author Affiliations: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (Drs Bolton, Gail, Chanock, and Hartge); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Dr Bolton); Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Australia (Drs Chenevix-Trench and Johnatty and Ms Healey); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (Ms Goh); Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel (Drs Sadetzki and Hirsh-Yechezkel and Mss Chetrit and Lubin); Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel (Dr Sadetzki); Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Drs Ramus and Gayther); Women's Cancer Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (Drs Karlan, Cass, Walsh, Li, Leuchter, and Gordon and Ms Gross); VIB Vesalius Research Center, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Dr Lambrechts); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Dr Despierre); Center for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (Drs Easton, Peock, and Antoniou and Mr Barrowdale and Mss McGuffog and Frost); Unit of Genetic Predisposition to Common Cancers, Hospices Civils de Lyon−Center Léon Bérard, Lyon, and INSERM U1052, CNRS UMR5286, University Lyon 1, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, France (Dr Sinilnikova); Human Genetics Group (Dr García), Human Cancer Genetics Program and Genotyping Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (Dr Benítez), and CIBERER (Drs Benítez and García), Madrid, Spain; Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, California (Dr Neuhausen and Ms Steele); Genetic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Center, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (Dr Evans); Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom (Dr Eeles); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (Dr Godwin); Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr Daly); The Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Cancer Genetics Center (Drs Kwong and Ma), and Division of Molecular Pathology (Dr Ma), Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Central Block, Hong Kong; Division of Breast Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong (Dr Kwong); Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L’Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain (Drs Lázaro and Blanco); Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit (Dr Montagna) and Medical Oncology Unit 1 (Dr Nicoletto), Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padua, Italy; Department of Oncology and Surgical Sciences, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy (Dr D’Andrea); Department of Virus, Hormones, and Cancer, Danish Cancer Society, and Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen (Drs Kjær, Jensen, and Høgdall), Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota (Drs Goode and Fridley); Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland (Drs Loud, Greene, and Mai); Ontario Cancer Genetics Network, Cancer Care Ontario (Dr Andrulis and Mr Glendon), and Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital (Dr Andrulis), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Departments of Internal Medicine and Molecular Virology, Immunology, and Medical Genetics, The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Toland); Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Department of Internal Medicine, The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus (Ms Senter); Gynecological Oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, England (Dr Gore); University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Center, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland (Drs Gourley and Michie); Cancer Research United Kingdom, Departments of Oncology and Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeway's Research Laboratory, Cambridge, England (Drs Song, Tyrer, and Pharoah); Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California (Drs Whittemore, McGuire, and Sieh); Department of Clinical Genetics, University and Regional Laboratories Skåne and Lund University, Lund, Sweden (Dr Kristoffersson); Department of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (Drs Olsson and Borg); Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Dr Levine); University of California San Francisco Cancer Risk Program, San Francisco (Drs Beattie and Nussbaum and Ms Chan); Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (Drs Beattie and Nussbaum); Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Moysich); and Sections of Epidemiology and Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research and Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Center, London, England (Dr Garcia-Closas).

Abstract

Context Approximately 10% of women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) carry deleterious germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. A recent article suggested that BRCA2 -related EOC was associated with an improved prognosis, but the effect of BRCA1 remains unclear.
Objective To characterize the survival of BRCA carriers with EOC compared with noncarriers and to determine whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers show similar survival patterns.
Design, Setting, and Participants A pooled analysis of 26 observational studies on the survival of women with ovarian cancer, which included data from 1213 EOC cases with pathogenic germline mutations in BRCA1 (n = 909) or BRCA2 (n = 304) and from 2666 noncarriers recruited and followed up at variable times between 1987 and 2010 (the median year of diagnosis was 1998).
Main Outcome Measure Five-year overall mortality.
Results The 5-year overall survival was 36% (95% CI, 34%-38%) for noncarriers, 44% (95% CI, 40%-48%) for BRCA1 carriers, and 52% (95% CI, 46%-58%) for BRCA2 carriers. After adjusting for study and year of diagnosis, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers showed a more favorable survival than noncarriers (for BRCA1: hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.89; P < .001; and for BRCA2: HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50-0.76; P < .001). These survival differences remained after additional adjustment for stage, grade, histology, and age at diagnosis (for BRCA1: HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64-0.84; P < .001; and for BRCA2: HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39-0.61; P < .001). The BRCA1 HR estimate was significantly different from the HR estimated in the adjusted model (P for heterogeneity = .003).
Conclusion Among patients with invasive EOC, having a germline mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 was associated with improved 5-year overall survival. BRCA2 carriers had the best prognosis.
Association Between BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations and Survival in Women With Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, January 25, 2012, Bolton et al. 307 (4): 382 — JAMA


Related article

Articles citing this article

Genetic variation increases risk of metabolic side effects in children on some antipsychotics

Contact: Jennifer Kohm
jkohm@cfri.ca
604-875-2401
Child & Family Research Institute


Genetic variation increases risk of metabolic side effects in children on some antipsychotics


Associated with increased blood pressure and elevated blood sugar levels


Researchers have found a genetic variation predisposing children to six-times greater risk of developing metabolic syndrome when taking second-generation anti-psychotic medications. Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of conditions that are risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The study showed a close association with two conditions in particular: high blood pressure and elevated fasting blood sugar levels, which is a precursor to diabetes. The research is published today in the medical research journal Translational Psychiatry.

"This is the first report of an underlying biological factor predisposing children to complications associated with second-generation anti-psychotic medication use," says Dr Dina Panagiotopoulos, study co-author, clinician scientist at the Child & Family Research Institute (CFRI), pediatric endocrinologist at BC Children's Hospital, and assistant professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia (UBC).

"It's concerning because these children take medications to treat a chronic disease – mental illness – and then develop risk factors for a second chronic disease," says Dr. Angela Devlin, study co-author, CFRI scientist and assistant professor in the UBC Department of Pediatrics.

Second-generation anti-psychotics are prescribed to approximately 5500 children and youth in British Columbia for psychotic disorders, mood and anxiety disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorders, adjustment disorders and substance abuse. Of these medications, the two most commonly prescribed in B.C. are quetiapine (Seroquel®) and risperidone (Risperdal®).

For the study, researchers assessed 209 children who were inpatients between April 2008 and June 2011 at the Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Department at BC Children's Hospital, an agency of the Provincial Health Services Authority. Their average age was 13 years, and 105 of the children were treated with second-generation anti-psychotics while 112 did not use these drugs. DNA analysis showed that eight per cent of children from both groups had a genetic variation called C677T on the MTHFR gene. Children with the MTHFR C677T variant who used these medications were six-times more likely to have metabolic syndrome.

The researchers targeted the MTHFR C677T variant because it is known to be associated with metabolic syndrome in adults who have schizophrenia, and with cardiovascular disease in adults who don't have psychiatric illness.

Dr. Devlin and Dr. Panagiotopoulos say their discovery is an important step to preventing and managing metabolic complications associated with second-generation antipsychotic medications. It is critical to reduce these risks in childhood because adults with mental illness have a 19 per cent increased mortality rate that is largely due to cardiovascular disease risk.

The MTHFR gene is involved in metabolizing the B-vitamin folate.

"We now plan to assess B vitamin status and dietary intake in children who take these medications to gain a better understanding of this association," says Dr. Panagiotopoulos.

###
This study was funded by CFRI and the Canadian Diabetes Association.

Dr. Panagiotopoulos's previous research on the metabolic side effects of anti-psychotics in children led to national recommendations for clinicians on monitoring and managing the care of children who take these medications. The recommendations were published in the Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in August 2011 and in Pediatrics and Child Health in November 2011.

CFRI conducts discovery, clinical and applied research to benefit the health of children and families. It is the largest institute of its kind in Western Canada. CFRI works in close partnership with UBC; BC Children's Hospital and Sunny Hill Health Centre for Children, BC Women's Hospital & Health Centre, agencies of PHSA; and BC Children's Hospital Foundation. CFRI has additional important relationships with British Columbia's (B.C.'s) five regional health authorities and with B.C. academic institutions Simon Fraser University, the University of Victoria, the University of Northern British Columbia, and the British Columbia Institute of Technology. For more information, visit http://www.cfri.ca/.

BC Children's Hospital, an agency of the Provincial Health Services Authority, provides expert care for the province's most seriously ill or injured children, including newborns and adolescents. BC Children's is an academic health centre affiliated with the University of British Columbia, Simon Fraser University, and the Child & Family Research Institute. For more information, please visit http://www.bcchildrens.ca/.

UBC is one of Canada's largest and most prestigious public research and teaching institutions, and one of only two Canadian institutions to be consistently ranked among the world's 40 best universities. Surrounded by the beauty of the Canadian West, it is a place that inspires bold, new ways of thinking that have helped make it a national leader in areas as diverse as community service learning, sustainability and research commercialization. UBC attracts $550 million per year in research funding from government, non-profit organizations and industry through 7,000 grants. For more information, visit http://www.ubc.ca/.

----------------------------
Genetic variation increases risk of metabolic side effects in children on some antipsychotics

Translational Psychiatry - Abstract of article: Cardiometabolic risk and the MTHFR C677T variant in children treated with second-generation antipsychotics

Published online 24 January 2012

Cardiometabolic risk and the MTHFR C677T variant in children treated with second-generation antipsychotics

A M Devlin1, Y F Ngai1, R Ronsley1 and C Panagiotopoulos1
1Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Child and Family Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
Correspondence: Dr AM Devlin, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Child and Family Research Institute, 272-950 West 28th Ave, Vancouver V6K 4A9, Canada. E-mail: adevlin@cfri.ubc.ca; Dr C Panagiotopoulos, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Endocrinology and Diabetes Unit, British Columbia Children's Hospital, 4480 Oak St, ACB K4-213, Vancouver, V6H 3V4, Canada. E-mail: dpanagiotopoulos@cw.bc.ca
Received 8 November 2011; Revised 9 December 2011; Accepted 11 December 2011
Top

Abstract

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are increasingly being used to treat children with a variety of psychiatric illnesses. Metabolic syndrome (MetS), a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, is a side-effect of SGA-treatment. We conducted a cross-sectional study and assessed the association of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T variant with features of MetS in SGA-treated (n=105) and SGA–naïve (n=112) children. We targeted the MTHFR C677T variant, because it is associated with risk for cardiovascular disease, and features of MetS in adults without psychiatric illness. MetS in children is based on the presence of any three of the following: waist circumference greater than or equal to90th percentile for age and sex; plasma triglyceride greater than or equal to1.24mmoll−1; plasma high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol less than or equal to1.03mmoll−1; systolic or diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to90th percentile for age, sex, and height; and fasting glucose greater than or equal to5.6mmoll−1. We found that 15% of SGA-treated children had MetS compared with 2% of SGA-naïve children (OR 8.113, P<0.05). No effect of the MTHFR C677T variant on psychiatric diagnosis was observed. The MTHFR 677T allele was associated (P<0.05) with MetS (OR 5.75, 95% CI= 1.18–28.12) in SGA-treated children. Models adjusted for duration of SGA treatment, ethnicity, sex, age and use of other medications revealed a positive relationship between the MTHFR 677T allele and diastolic blood pressure Z-scores (P=0.001) and fasting plasma glucose (P<0.05) in SGA-treated children. These findings illustrate the high prevalence of MetS in SGA-treated children and suggest metabolic alterations associated with the MTHFR C677T variant may have a role in the development of MetS features in SGA-treated children.
Translational Psychiatry - Abstract of article: Cardiometabolic risk and the MTHFR C677T variant in children treated with second-generation antipsychotics

PHG Foundation | Genes may help brains age better

Genes may help brains age better

24 January 2012   |   By Rebecca Bazeley   |   News story
Sources: Wall Street Journal, Nature
Taking advantage of an unusual database, researchers have been able to estimate the influence genes have on changes in our cognitive ability over a lifetime.  
 
The database holds results of intelligence tests taken by a cohort of over 65 year olds in Scotland. What makes the database special is that it also holds results from intelligence tests sat by the same participants as children, providing a rare insight into cognitive change over a lifetime.  
 
Analysis of the DNA provided by participants alongside the intelligence test results shows genes may influence 24% of changes in our intellectual performance as we age.  While the environment asserts a greater influence, genes  may help some brains age better than others.
The findings come with a health warning – the sample size is too small to provide statistical significance.  However, the Scottish study gives points to avenues worthy of further exploration once data from larger long-term studies, such as the UK National Survey of Health and Development, become available. 
PHG Foundation Genes may help brains age better

Genetic contributions to stability and change in inte... [Nature. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI

Nature. 2012 Jan 18. doi: 10.1038/nature10781. [Epub ahead of print]

Genetic contributions to stability and change in intelligence from childhood to old age.

Source

1] Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK [2] Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK [3].

Abstract

Understanding the determinants of healthy mental ageing is a priority for society today. So far, we know that intelligence differences show high stability from childhood to old age and there are estimates of the genetic contribution to intelligence at different ages. However, attempts to discover whether genetic causes contribute to differences in cognitive ageing have been relatively uninformative. Here we provide an estimate of the genetic and environmental contributions to stability and change in intelligence across most of the human lifetime. We used genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data from 1,940 unrelated individuals whose intelligence was measured in childhood (age 11 years) and again in old age (age 65, 70 or 79 years). We use a statistical method that allows genetic (co)variance to be estimated from SNP data on unrelated individuals. We estimate that causal genetic variants in linkage disequilibrium with common SNPs account for 0.24 of the variation in cognitive ability change from childhood to old age. Using bivariate analysis, we estimate a genetic correlation between intelligence at age 11 years and in old age of 0.62. These estimates, derived from rarely available data on lifetime cognitive measures, warrant the search for genetic causes of cognitive stability and change.

PMID:
22258510
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Genetic contributions to stability and change in inte... [Nature. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI

Rare and common variants: twenty arguments. [Nat Rev Genet. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI

Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Jan 18;13(2):135-45. doi: 10.1038/nrg3118.

Rare and common variants: twenty arguments.

Source

School of Biology and Center for Integrative Genomics, 770 State Street, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have greatly improved our understanding of the genetic basis of disease risk. The fact that they tend not to identify more than a fraction of the specific causal loci has led to divergence of opinion over whether most of the variance is hidden as numerous rare variants of large effect or as common variants of very small effect. Here I review 20 arguments for and against each of these models of the genetic basis of complex traits and conclude that both classes of effect can be readily reconciled.

PMID:
22251874
[PubMed - in process]
Rare and common variants: twenty arguments. [Nat Rev Genet. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI