domingo, 31 de marzo de 2013

Frequent Moves Take Toll on Poor Kids, Study Suggests: MedlinePlus

Frequent Moves Take Toll on Poor Kids, Study Suggests: MedlinePlus


A service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
From the National Institutes of HealthNational Institutes of Health

 
MedlinePlus Logo
Email this page to a friendShare on facebookShare on twitterBookmark & Share

Frequent Moves Take Toll on Poor Kids, Study Suggests

Fallout anticipated from U.S. housing crisis, researcher says
 (*this news item will not be available after 06/26/2013)
By Robert Preidt
Thursday, March 28, 2013HealthDay Logo
HealthDay news image
Related MedlinePlus Pages
THURSDAY, March 28 (HealthDay News) -- Poor children who move three or more times before they're 5 years old are at increased risk for behavioral problems, a new study contends.
Researchers examined data from about 2,800 children born in 20 large U.S. cities between 1998 and 2000. By age 5, fewer than one-quarter of the children had never moved, 48 percent had moved once or twice, and 29 percent had moved three or more times.
Among the children who moved three or more times, 44 percent were poor. These children had more attention problems, anxiety or depression, and aggressiveness and hyperactivity at age 5 than those who had moved fewer times or never moved.
The increases in behavioral problems were seen only among poor children who moved three or more times. This suggests that frequent moves early in life are most disruptive for poor children, according to the authors of the study, published March 28 in the journal Child Development.
"The United States is still recovering from the great recession, which has taken a major toll on the housing market," study leader Kathleen Ziol-Guest, a postdoctoral associate at Cornell University, said in a news release from the Society for Research in Child Development. "As housing markets have collapsed across communities, highly mobile low-income families have moved in search of work and less expensive housing."
She said the study findings suggest that the upheaval caused by the housing crisis likely will have negative effects on young children, especially poor children.
Previous research has shown that frequent moves are associated with a range of behavioral, emotional and school problems for teens.
Moving is fairly common in the United States, the researchers noted. For example, in 2002, nearly 7 percent of all children had been living in their current home for less than six months. That figure was 10 percent among poor children.
Although the study found an association between behavioral problems among poor children at age 5 and frequent moves before that age, it did not prove a cause-and-effect relationship.
SOURCE: Society for Research in Child Development, news release, March 28, 2013
HealthDay

Upping vigorous exercise may improve fibromyalgia: MedlinePlus

Upping vigorous exercise may improve fibromyalgia: MedlinePlus


A service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
From the National Institutes of HealthNational Institutes of Health

 
MedlinePlus Logo
Email this page to a friendShare on facebookShare on twitterBookmark & Share

Upping vigorous exercise may improve fibromyalgia

 (*this news item will not be available after 06/26/2013)
Thursday, March 28, 2013Reuters Health Information Logo
By Kathryn Doyle
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - For those who are able, exercising once or twice more weekly may alleviate some symptoms of a chronic pain condition without making joints feel worse, according to a new study.
Previous studies have found short-term benefits of exercise for fibromyalgia, a poorly understood disorder that includes joint pain, tenderness, fatigue and depression and affects an estimated 5.8 million Americans, according to the Centers for Disease Control.
But many fibromyalgia sufferers fail to keep up with exercise programs out of fear that it will worsen pain, Dr. Eric Matteson, a rheumatologist who was not involved in the study, told Reuters Health.
"This study shows that if they're able to stay with the exercise program in the long term it actually is helpful to them," said Matteson, chair of the department of rheumatology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.
As part of a larger study funded by the National Institutes of Health, researchers recruited 170 people who had been diagnosed with fibromyalgia, had been on medication for the condition for at least a month and reported low levels of physical activity.
Each person received a personalized aerobic exercise "prescription" based on their current fitness level, which usually meant walking around a track, according to lead author Anthony Kaleth, who designed the regimens.
Over three months the exercise programs gradually increased in intensity from twice weekly 10-minute sessions to up to four weekly 30-minute sessions of moderate exercise achieving 60 percent of maximum heart rate.
"It would be considered low to moderate intensity for the average individual," Kaleth, who specializes in exercise testing at Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, told Reuters Health.
Over the three months of the program and for the next six months the participants reported their activity levels in a questionnaire.
Other questionnaires assessed how their fibromyalgia symptoms changed, including muscle impairment, overall wellbeing, pain levels and depression.
At the end of the study, 27 people said they'd sustained the exercise over all nine months, 68 increased their workout efforts for three months then decreased again and 75 were no more active than when they started.
The first two groups also reported less physical impairment and better overall wellbeing than those who did not increase their activity at all. A steady increase in intensity was linked to a slight decrease in pain, although a temporary bump in exercise was not. Depression levels did not change in any group.
"One of the best known therapeutic activities for fibromyalgia patients is exercise," Kaleth said. "Our study confirmed that result."
Any increase in activity, whether or not it was maintained, resulted in positive changes in symptoms and no increased pain, according to the findings in Arthritis Care and Research.
If they had followed the participants for a longer period of time, they might have seen more benefits for people who maintained the program, Kaleth said.
Most people use a combination of medications, including pain relievers, antidepressants and anti-seizure drugs to alleviate fibromyalgia symptoms. Doctors also recommend keeping active with walking, swimming or water aerobics, but many patients are reluctant to start exercising.
"They're more worried that it's going to be painful, but that's more of a psychological effect," Kaleth said.
Starting off too vigorously before building up endurance can be painful for anyone, with or without fibromyalgia, Matteson said.
"This is a stepping stone I think in terms of the actual result that we found," Kaleth said.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/VQuyoP Arthritis Care and Research, online February 11, 2013.
Reuters Health

More Health News on:
Exercise and Physical Fitness

Rubella in Pregnancy Rare in U.S., But Can Be Devastating for Baby: MedlinePlus

Rubella in Pregnancy Rare in U.S., But Can Be Devastating for Baby: MedlinePlus


A service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
From the National Institutes of HealthNational Institutes of Health

 
MedlinePlus Logo
Email this page to a friendShare on facebookShare on twitterBookmark & Share

Rubella in Pregnancy Rare in U.S., But Can Be Devastating for Baby

'German measles' caused serious birth defects in 3 cases in 3 states in 2012, health officials say
URL of this page: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_135372.html (*this news item will not be available after 06/26/2013)
By Robert Preidt
Thursday, March 28, 2013HealthDay Logo
HealthDay news imageTHURSDAY, March 28 (HealthDay News) -- Although rare in the United States, three babies with birth defects caused by rubella (or "German measles") were reported in 2012 and doctors need to be on the lookout for such cases, a new government report indicates.
Birth defects caused by what doctors call "congenital rubella syndrome" can include cataracts, hearing problems and heart abnormalities. The syndrome occurs when a pregnant woman is infected with rubella and passes it to her fetus.
More than 90 percent of people in the United States have been vaccinated against rubella or have natural immunity, which means that congenital rubella syndrome is extremely rare in the nation.
But last year, three cases of the syndrome were reported in Alabama, Illinois and Maryland. In all three cases, the mothers did not have documentation of rubella vaccination, were born in another country, became pregnant and were likely infected in Africa, the report said.
The infants were born with brain malformations, heart defects, cataracts, hearing problems, blood disorders and inflammation of lung tissue (pneumonitis). One of the babies died due to the syndrome.
Even though congenital rubella syndrome is rare in the United States, health care providers and public health officials "should maintain a high level of suspicion" if they encounter children who have birth defects compatible with the syndrome who were born to mothers who spent time during their pregnancy in countries where rubella is endemic, the researchers said in a news release from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
One expert noted that infection is most dangerous early in the pregnancy.
"The most severe manifestations occur when the maternal infection is in the first trimester," said Dr. Martin Chavez, director of maternal fetal medicine in the department of obstetrics & gynecology at Winthrop University Hospital, in Mineola, N.Y. "These can include blindness, neurological damage and/or heart defects."
"While we are fortunate in the United States that most individuals have been vaccinated and are immune, health care providers that serve foreign-born populations must be aware that other countries may have much lower immunity rates," Chavez added. "Efforts should be made to document or verify the immune status of all reproductive-age women."
The report, by Kurt Setoo of the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, and colleagues there and elsewhere, is published in the March 28 issue of the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality and Weekly Report.
SOURCE: Martin Chavez, M.D., director, maternal fetal medicine, department of obstetrics & gynecology, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, N.Y.; U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, news release, March 28, 2013
HealthDay
More Health News on:
Birth Defects
Infections and Pregnancy

Researchers Test Implanted Brain Stimulator for Alzheimer's: MedlinePlus

Researchers Test Implanted Brain Stimulator for Alzheimer's: MedlinePlus


A service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
From the National Institutes of HealthNational Institutes of Health

MedlinePlus Logo
Email this page to a friendShare on facebookShare on twitterBookmark & Share

Researchers Test Implanted Brain Stimulator for Alzheimer's

They hope the device will restore some thinking ability and improve focus, attention
URL of this page: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_135371.html (*this news item will not be available after 06/26/2013)
Thursday, March 28, 2013HealthDay Logo
HealthDay news image
Related MedlinePlus Page
THURSDAY, March 28 (HealthDay News) -- Researchers are testing whether applying electrical stimulation directly to the brains of people with Alzheimer's disease might improve thinking, focus and alertness.
The process, called direct brain stimulation, or deep brain stimulation (DBS), has been used to treat Parkinson's disease and is being tested as a treatment for other conditions, including traumatic brain injuries and obesity, according to the researchers.
Two women have had the electronic brain stimulators implanted, and eight more patients will participate in this initial research.
"There are a lot of studies out there that say physical or mental stimulation may reduce the risk or impact of Alzheimer's disease, so we wondered if increasing stimulation to certain parts of the brain may be protective," explained study co-author Dr. Douglas Scharre, director of the division of cognitive neurology at Ohio State University.
Scharre said that while Alzheimer's tends to affect the temporal, parietal and frontal lobes of the brain, he wanted to focus particularly on the frontal lobe for two reasons: it's typically the last brain area to degenerate, and its functions -- decision-making, problem-solving, focus and alertness -- are necessary for a person to be independent.
Placing the DBS system involves two steps. First, in a surgical procedure that requires about a three-day hospital stay, the patient has tiny holes made in each side of the skull, and hair-thin wires are placed in precise spots of the brain using computer-guided technology. The wires are fed through the neck -- in the subcutaneous tissue just under the skin -- and left there for about a week while the burr holes heal, explained Scharre.
Then, in an outpatient surgery, the patient has two battery packs that look like heart pacemakers placed on each side of the chest. The wires placed the week before are then connected to the batteries.
Six weeks after the second surgery, the stimulator is turned on. "My job [as the neurologist] is to find the right settings to get the maximum benefit," said Scharre. Each wire has four contacts, providing a wide range of different voltage combinations, and the challenge is to determine the right amount to produce the best benefit, he explained.
The research could potentially be of value to millions of Americans: a recent report from the Alzheimer's Association found that one in every three seniors now dies while suffering from Alzheimer's or another form of dementia. Alzheimer's disease becomes progressively disabling with loss of memory, thinking skills, the ability to socialize and independence.
To assess the effects of DBS, the researchers give short tests to the patients, starting about two months after the surgeries, to evaluate their level of attention and alertness, and to see how fast they can complete a particular task. For example, one test shows a variety of different geometric shapes all over the page, and [the patient] is asked to pick out all the stars in a 30-second timeframe.
In addition to the evaluation of thinking-related functions, the researchers look for brain wave changes and perform MRI scans, PET imaging, brain scans and spinal fluid analysis. Scharre said the researchers will need a year's worth of data to assess each patient and about two years to achieve the goal of involving 10 people in the research.
The first person to have the pacemaker implanted was Kathy Sanford, 57, who has early onset Alzheimer's and has just finished 12 weeks of stimulation. "Initially, we've seen some improvements in speed of processing and she did better on shifting tasks," reported Scharre. "While we're happy we're seeing changes, I would be very, very cautious; the real test is whether we see sustained effects over time."
Kathy's father, Joseph Jester, said the family has already seen signs that Kathy's memory is improving.
Kathy is highly motivated to participate in the study, Jester explained. "She has two daughters and a grandson who she is worried about, and [she] hopes if this treatment works, they would have an alternative should they inherit this disease."
Jester said while he appreciates the opportunity for Kathy to participate in the study, it has been time consuming and sometimes disappointing as the physicians adjust and readjust pacemaker settings. "The doctors assure us that [her settings] are on the best place possible and we need patience as she goes forward from here."
As for other potential downsides to participating in the research, the two patients who have had the pacemakers and battery packs surgically placed have had no complications, according to Scharre. Should they have any problems associated with the actual stimulation, it's easy to just turn it off, he noted.
Experts encouraged caution at this point in the study.
"This is interesting but preliminary research," said Maria Carrillo, vice president of medical and scientific relations at the Alzheimer's Association. But it is good to see alternative treatment methods for Alzheimer's are being tested, she added.
SOURCES: Douglas Scharre, M.D., neurologist and director, division of cognitive neurology, Ohio State University, Columbus; Maria Carrillo, Ph.D., vice president, medical and scientific relations, Alzheimer's Association, Chicago; Joseph Jester
HealthDay
More Health News on:
Alzheimer's Disease

Texting fails to boost flu shots in pregnant women: MedlinePlus

Texting fails to boost flu shots in pregnant women: MedlinePlus


A service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
From the National Institutes of HealthNational Institutes of Health

 
MedlinePlus Logo
Email this page to a friendShare on facebookShare on twitterBookmark & Share

Texting fails to boost flu shots in pregnant women

 (*this news item will not be available after 06/26/2013)
Thursday, March 28, 2013Reuters Health Information Logo
Related MedlinePlus Pages
By Trevor Stokes
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Text message reminders don't increase flu vaccinations in pregnant women, according to a small pilot study.
"Text messaging may be effective in some contexts and not in others," lead study author Dr. Michelle Moniz, of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, told Reuters Health.
Between 2010 and 2011, researchers sent 12 weekly text messages to 158 pregnant women who were mostly poor, black, uninsured and had previously declined to receive a flu shot.
All expectant mothers received text reminders to take prenatal vitamins and to eat nutritious foods, but half of the women received messages to get vaccinated. Even with the additional encouragement, only around 30 percent in either group received flu shots in the study that appeared in the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control recommends all pregnant women get flu shots.
Though vaccination rates didn't change, most women (90 percent) said they enjoyed receiving the text messages and the majority (70 percent) said prenatal care was more satisfying with text message reminders.
Texting is moving past teenaged LOLs and into the doctor's office as physicians worldwide figure out how to use the 160-character messages as an inexpensive, private and convenient mode of communication to help patients.
Studies have already shown that text reminders can help patients quit smoking, manage chronic illnesses like diabetes and follow through on some vaccinations.
However, an analysis of 42 clinical studies of text messages showed in January that text reminders only modestly increased patient attendance to their doctor's appointments.
"We really don't know the best way to harness the technology in order to communicate from provider to patient," said Carolyn Rose Ahlers-Schmidt, research associate professor at the University of Kansas School of Medicine - Wichita, who in her own work has found text reminders to new mothers don't increase vaccination rates in their newborns.
Instead of focusing on texting, clinics require a broader communication system so if a patient's cell phone is disconnected, an email is sent or if a text bounces back, an automated voice message is sent, said Ahlers-Schmidt, who was not involved in the current study
Texting may not have changed flu shot rates, Moniz said, because the pregnant study participants were particularly wary of side effects, didn't like shots, or had had a bad experience with the flu vaccine.
Successful texting efforts focused on participants who were willing to get vaccinated in the first place and needed booster shot reminders, Moniz said, unlike the unwilling pregnant women.
"This challenges us to be more creative in the way we do text messaging," said Keith Petrie, a professor of psychological medicine at the University of Auckland in New Zealand, who has found in his own research that text messages tailored to individual asthma patients can help increase medicine adherence.
"There's great potential for the technology to be used just as an alarm, which in the end can be quite annoying," Petrie, who was not involved in the current work, told Reuters Health.
SOURCE: bit.ly/16f6TzA Obstetrics & Gynecology, online March 7, 2013.
Reuters Health

Cutting Out Mealtime Distractions May Help Manage Weight: MedlinePlus

Cutting Out Mealtime Distractions May Help Manage Weight: MedlinePlus


A service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
From the National Institutes of HealthNational Institutes of Health

 
MedlinePlus Logo

Cutting Out Mealtime Distractions May Help Manage Weight

Slowing down, focusing on food could keep you from overeating later, study contends
 (*this news item will not be available after 06/26/2013)
Thursday, March 28, 2013HealthDay Logo
HealthDay news image
Related MedlinePlus Page
THURSDAY, March 28 (HealthDay News) -- Too much multitasking could make you overeat, a new study suggests. So if you're finding it hard to reach or maintain your ideal weight, slowing down and savoring your meal might help.
Taking the time to focus on your food -- appreciating how it tastes and smells -- may keep you from snacking or overstuffing hours later.
Researchers have discovered that watching television may not just be doing what experts have long assumed: turning you into an exercise-avoiding couch potato. The couch isn't necessarily the problem -- it's that you're not paying attention to what you're eating. That tends to make you feel less full -- some people can't even remember what they ate and when -- which in turn causes them to eat even more.
"We have assumed TV was decreasing everyone's exercise but in principle it might be the distraction [that leads to weight gain]," said lead study author Eric Robinson, a research fellow at the Institute of Psychology, Health and Society at the University of Liverpool, in England.
Being aware and remembering what you've been eating may influence how much you eat, so enhancing your focus and memory of your intake could be critical to helping you eat less, Robinson said.
Instead of consciously counting calories, people may be better served by thinking about what they're eating, noticing the taste, texture and aroma of the food, and chewing a little more slowly instead of chowing down a meal quickly, he said.
Robinson became interested in memory and its potential impact on food intake after reviewing studies of people who suffered amnesia or severe memory loss. Studies showed that people who were unable to remember something that occurred just a short time ago would eat lunch, and then, when served another meal shortly thereafter, would eat again -- even though they were presumably full.
"They would happily carry on eating, and this shows memory systems play a role in stimulating eating and hunger," Robinson said.
The research, published in the April issue of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, analyzed 24 studies that had investigated the influence of attention and memory on food intake. All studies involved at least two different groups -- often made up of college students -- and compared the results between the groups. For example, one gave a specific meal to people who were watching television and the same meal to people who were not. Another compared people who ate alone to those who ate while watching television or a recorded radio drama.
The findings suggest the following conclusions:
  • Being distracted or less attentive to the food you're eating tends to make you eat more at that sitting.
  • Paying attention to what you're eating tends to make you eat less later on.
  • Even those who are dieting -- called "restrained eaters" by the researchers -- may eat more if they are distracted than if they are able to focus on their food.
Connie Diekman, director of university nutrition at Washington University at St. Louis, said the research reinforces what dieticians have known for a long time: If you don't pay attention to what you're eating, you will eat more. But she said the new research adds something to the science: Eating while distracted will also affect what you eat later.
"That's a big part that people may not have really thought about before," she said.
Yet for many busy families, slowing down meals may seem impossible. "We've become a grab-and-go-society," she said. "People will eat meals in less than five minutes."
Diekman suggested that even those who dine alone should set a place at the table, cook a meal and enjoy it. "Don't automatically turn on the TV," she said.
Even if you're eating while working at your computer, you can still focus a bit more on the food, Diekman added. "Eat, and then look at the computer, and then eat a few more bites," she said. "Slowing down may be important because it allows you to focus on your food."
For Diekman, the message is simple: "It's all about making a meal an experience and not just eating food," she said.
SOURCES: Eric Robinson, Ph.D., research fellow, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, England; Connie Diekman, R.D., M.Ed., director of university nutrition, Washington University at St. Louis; April 2013 American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
HealthDay

More Health News on:
Weight Control

CDC Online Newsroom - Press Release - Valley Fever Increasing in Some Southwestern States

CDC Online Newsroom - Press Release - Valley Fever Increasing in Some Southwestern States

Press Release

For Immediate Release: March 28, 2013
Contact: Division of News & Electronic Media, Office of Communication
(404) 639-3286

Valley Fever Increasing in Some Southwestern States

Valley Fever, a fungal respiratory infection, dramatically increased in several southwestern states from 1998 through 2011, according to a new study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cases in Arizona, California, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah rose from 2,265 in 1998 to more than 22,000 in 2011.
Valley Fever (Coccidioidomycosis) is caused by inhaling a fungus called Coccidioides, which lives in the soil in the southwestern United States. Not everyone who is exposed to the fungus gets sick, but those who do typically have flu-like symptoms that can last for weeks or months. More than 40 percent of patients who get ill from Valley Fever may require hospitalization at some point, with an average cost of nearly $50,000 per hospital visit. Previous studies have shown that, of those who get sick, nearly 75 percent miss work or school – for approximately two weeks.
"Valley Fever is causing real health problems for many people living in the southwestern United States," said CDC Director Tom Frieden, M.D., M.P.H. "Because fungus particles spread through the air, it’s nearly impossible to completely avoid exposure to this fungus in these hardest-hit states. It’s important that people be aware of Valley Fever if they live in or have travelled to the southwest United States."
This recent increase in Valley Fever could be related to changes in weather, which could impact where the fungus grows and how much of it is circulating; higher numbers of new residents; or changes in the way the disease is detected and reported to the states or CDC. More research is needed to understand why the number of reported cases of Valley Fever has increased. Between 1998 and 2011, Arizona and California had average increases in Valley Fever incidence of 16 and 13 percent per year, respectively. The CDC has provided grants to these two states to study Valley Fever.

During this time period, nearly 112,000 cases of Valley Fever were reported from 28 states and Washington, D.C., but 66 percent of cases were in Arizona, 31 percent were in California, 1 percent were in Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah, and about 1 percent were in all other states combined.
"It’s difficult to say what’s causing the increase," said Benjamin J. Park, M.D., chief epidemiologist with CDC’s Mycotic Diseases Branch. "This is a serious and costly disease and more research is needed on how to reduce its effects."
Doctors and patients should know that the symptoms of Valley Fever are very similar to flu or pneumonia symptoms and a lab test is the only way to tell if an illness is Valley Fever or not. Not everyone who gets Valley Fever needs treatment, but for people at risk for the more severe forms of the disease, early diagnosis and treatment is important. The best way to treat Valley Fever still needs to be studied, especially with the number of cases continuing to rise.
The study released Thursday was based on reporting of Valley Fever to the National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System. Many states collect and report case counts to CDC through this surveillance system.
For more information on Valley Fever, please visit http://www.cdc.gov/fungal/coccidioidomycosis.