sábado, 30 de abril de 2011

HIV/AIDS Update - Update to Fuzeon (enfuvirti​de) label regarding incidence of bacterial pneumonia

HIV/AIDS Update - Update to Fuzeon (enfuvirti​de) label regarding incidence of bacterial pneumonia



Updates to the Warnings and Precautions, Pneumonia subsection of the Fuzeon (enfuvirtide) package insert were approved on April 28, 2011 in response to results of a study conducted under a Postmarketing Commitment. Drug sponsor, Roche, submitted the results from an “Observational Cohort Study on the Incidence of Pneumonia in HIV-1 Patients Treated with Fuzeon.” The study was conducted as a result of findings during the initial review of the registrational Phase 3 trials, which showed a relative increase in the incidence of bacterial pneumonia for subjects receiving Fuzeon versus control subjects. The increased pneumonia findings were included in the Warnings and Precautions section of the package insert.

The findings from the study are included in Warnings and Precautions section 5.3 Pneumonia of the package insert as follows. The new text appears below in italics.


5.3 Pneumonia

An increased rate of bacterial pneumonia was observed in subjects treated with FUZEON in the Phase 3 clinical trials compared to the control arm. The incidence of pneumonia was 2.7% or 3.2 events/100 patient-years in subjects receiving FUZEON + background regimen. On analysis of all diagnoses of pneumonia (pneumonia, bacterial pneumonia, bronchopneumonia, and related terms) in T20-301 and T20-302, an increased rate of bacterial pneumonia was observed in subjects treated with FUZEON compared to the control arm (6.9%, 6.7 pneumonia events per 100-patietn-years versus 0.6 events per 100 patient-years, respectively). Approximately half of the study subjects with pneumonia required hospitalization. Three subject deaths in the FUZEON arm were attributed to pneumonia; all three had serious concomitant AIDS-related illnesses that contributed to their deaths. Risk factors for pneumonia included low initial CD4 lymphocyte count, high initial viral load, intravenous drug use, smoking, and a prior history of lung disease.

Because it was unclear whether the higher incidence rate of pneumonia was related to FUZEON use, an observational study in 1850 HIV-infected patients (740 FUZEON treated patients and 1110 non-FUZEON treated patients) was conducted to evaluate the risk of pneumonia in patients treated with FUZEON. A total of 123 patients had a confirmed or probable pneumonia event in this study (62 in the FUZEON treatment arm with 1962 patient-years of observation and 61 in the non-FUZEON treatment arm with 3378 patient-years of observation). The incidence of pneumonia was 3.2 events/100 patient-years in the FUZEON treatment arm and 1.8 events/100 patient-years in the non-FUZEON treatment arm. The hazard ratio, adjusting for other baseline risk factors, was 1.34 (95% C.I. = 0.90 – 2.00). Based on this observational study, it is not possible to exclude an increased risk of pneumonia in patients treated with FUZEON compared to non-FUZEON treated patients.

It is unclear if the increased incidence of pneumonia is related to FUZEON use. However, because of these findings, patients with HIV-1 infection should be carefully monitored for signs and symptoms of pneumonia, especially if they have underlying conditions which may predispose them to pneumonia. Risk factors for pneumonia included low initial CD4 cell count, high initial viral load, intravenous drug use, smoking, and a prior history of lung disease.

The complete revised label will be posted soon at Drugs@FDA
Richard Klein
Office of Special Health Issues
Food and Drug Administration

Kimberly Struble
Division of Antiviral Drug Products
Food and Drug Administration

Transmission of Zika Virus, Colorado | CDC EID

EID Journal Home > Volume 17, Number 5–May 2011


Volume 17, Number 5–May 2011
Dispatch
Probable Non–Vector-borne Transmission of Zika Virus, Colorado, USA
Brian D. Foy, Kevin C. Kobylinski, Joy L. Chilson Foy, Bradley J. Blitvich, Amelia Travassos da Rosa, Andrew D. Haddow, Robert S. Lanciotti, and Robert B. Tesh

Author affiliations: Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (B.D. Foy, K.C. Kobylinski); Poudre Valley Hospital, Fort Collins (J.L.C. Foy); Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA (B.J. Blitvich); University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA (A. Travassos da Rosa, A.D. Haddow, R.B. Tesh); and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins (R.S. Lanciotti)


Suggested citation for this article

Abstract
Clinical and serologic evidence indicate that 2 American scientists contracted Zika virus infections while working in Senegal in 2008. One of the scientists transmitted this arbovirus to his wife after his return home. Direct contact is implicated as the transmission route, most likely as a sexually transmitted infection
.

Zika virus (ZIKV), a mosquito-transmitted flavivirus, has been isolated from sentinel monkeys, mosquitoes, and sick persons in Africa and Southeast Asia (1,2). Serologic surveys indicate that ZIKV infections can be relatively common among persons in southeastern Senegal and other areas of Africa, but that ZIKV-associated disease may be underreported or misdiagnosed. In 2007, a large outbreak of ZIKV infection occurred on Yap Island in the southwestern Pacific that infected ≈70% of the island's inhabitants (3), which highlighted this virus as an emerging pathogen. The purpose of this study was to investigate and report 3 unusual cases of arboviral disease that occurred in Colorado in 2008.

full-text:
Transmission of Zika Virus, Colorado | CDC EID

Suggested Citation for this Article
Foy BD, Kobylinski KC, Foy JLC, Blitvich BJ, Travassos da Rosa A, Haddow AD, et al. Probable non–vector-borne transmission of Zika virus, Colorado, USA. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2011 May [date cited].
http://www.cdc.gov/EID/content/17/5/880.htm


DOI: 10.3201/eid1705.101939


Comments to the Authors
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Brian D. Foy, Arthropod-borne and Infectious Diseases Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 80523-1692
; email: brian.foy@colostate.edu

Tick-Borne Relapsing Fever Borreliosis, Rural Senegal | CDC EID

EID Journal Home > Volume 17, Number 5–May 2011


Volume 17, Number 5–May 2011
Dispatch
Tick-Borne Relapsing Fever Borreliosis, Rural Senegal
Philippe Parola, Georges Diatta, Cristina Socolovschi, Oleg Mediannikov, Adama Tall, Hubert Bassene, Jean François Trape, and Didier Raoult

Author affiliations: Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France (P. Parola, G. Diatta, C. Socolovschi, O. Mediannikov, H. Bassene, J.F. Trape, D. Raoult); and Institut Pasteur de Dakar, Dakar, Senegal (A. Tall)


Suggested citation for this article


Abstract
Detecting spirochetes remains challenging in cases of African tick-borne relapsing fever. Using real-time PCR specific for the 16S rRNA Borrelia gene, we found 27 (13%) of 206 samples from febrile patients in rural Senegal to be positive, whereas thick blood smear examinations conducted at dispensaries identified only 4 (2%) as positive.


Tick-borne relapsing fever (TBRF), caused by several species of Borrelia spirochetes, is transmitted to humans through the bites of soft ticks of the genus Ornithodoros (through infected saliva or entry of infected coxal fluid at the bite site) (1). Wild rodents and insectivores are common reservoir hosts. TBRF-endemic foci persist around the world, where each Borrelia species causing relapsing fever appears to be specific to its tick vector. TBRF is responsible for recurring fever associated with spirochetemia. In recent years, the extent of relapsing fever caused by infection with B. crocidurae, transmitted by O. sonrai ticks and its effects on public health have only just begun to emerge. In Senegal, Mali, Mauritania, and the Gambia, where this tick is endemic, 2%–70% of animal burrows are inhabited by this tick vector, and an average of 31% of ticks are infected by B. crocidurae (2,3).

In Senegal, TBRF caused by B. crocidurae was recently determined to be the most common bacterial infection affecting the human population (3). A conventional diagnosis of TBRF is based on the detection of spirochetes in blood smears sampled during the acute febrile phase. However, TBRF is underdiagnosed in most disease-endemic areas, where blood smears are screened only for malaria parasites. Therefore, we used specific semiquantitative PCR to evaluate the role of TBRF as a cause of fever among malaria smear–negative patients in rural Senegal.


full-text:
Tick-Borne Relapsing Fever Borreliosis, Rural Senegal | CDC EID


Suggested Citation for this Article
Parola P, Diatta G, Socolovschi C, Mediannikov O, Tall A, Bassene H, et al. Tick-borne relapsing fever borreliosis, rural Senegal. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2011 May [date cited
]. http://www.cdc.gov/EID/content/17/5/883.htm


DOI: 10.3201/eid1705.100573


Comments to the Authors
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Didier Raoult, Unité de Recherche en Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes, UMR CNRS-IRD 6236-198, Faculté de Médecine, 27 Blvd Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille CEDEX 5, France
; email: didier.raoult@gmail.com

Novel BTV Serotype, Kuwait | CDC EID

EID Journal Home > Volume 17, Number 5–May 2011


Volume 17, Number 5–May 2011
Dispatch
Novel Bluetongue Virus Serotype from Kuwait
Sushila Maan, Narender S. Maan, Kyriaki Nomikou, Carrie Batten, Frank Antony, Manjunatha N. Belaganahalli, Attia Mohamed Samy, Ammar Abdel Reda, Sana Ahmed Al-Rashid, Maha El Batel, Chris A.L. Oura, and Peter P.C. Mertens

Author affiliations: Institute for Animal Health, Woking, UK (S. Maan, N.S. Maan, K. Nomikou, C. Batten, F. Antony, M.N. Belaganahalli, C.A.L. Oura, P.P.C. Mertens); Public Authority of Agriculture Affairs and Fish Resources, Kuwait City, Kuwait (A.M. Samy, A.A. Reda, S.A. Al-Rashid, M. El Batel); and Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt (A.M. Samy)


Suggested citation for this article


Abstract
Sheep and goats sampled in Kuwait during February 2010 were seropositive for bluetongue virus (BTV). BTV isolate KUW2010/02, from 1 of only 2 sheep that also tested positive for BTV by real-time reverse transcription–PCR, caused mild clinical signs in sheep. Nucleotide sequencing identified KUW2010/02 as a novel BTV serotype.


Bluetongue virus (BTV) infects ruminants, camelids, and occasionally large carnivores. Clinical signs of bluetongue disease (BT) are usually more severe in sheep or white-tailed deer, particularly in populations previously unexposed to the virus; cattle and goats are often asymptomatic (1). Initial diagnosis of BT based on clinical signs can be confirmed by virus isolation and characterization or identification of viral RNA by reverse transcription PCR.

BTV particles contain 3 concentric protein layers surrounding 10 linear double-stranded RNA genome segments, identified as segment-1 to segment-10 (Seg-1 to Seg-10) in order of decreasing size (from 3,954 bp to 822 bp) (2). Twenty-five BTV serotypes have been identified on the basis of the specificity of reactions with neutralizing antibodies generated by their mammalian hosts (3). Consequently, BTV outer capsid proteins, particularly viral protein (VP) 2 (encoded by Seg-2), show sequence variations that determine virus serotype (4). Other BTV proteins, including subcore shell protein VP3(T2) encoded by Seg-3, are more highly conserved (2). Phylogenetic comparisons of Seg-3 sequences have been used to identify different BTV topotypes and distinguish different Orbivirus species (4).

BTV has been reported in several Middle Eastern countries (Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Turkey, Cyprus, and Iraq) since 1951 (5). In 2008, Egypt reported the absence of BT, and Egypt is the only country in the region to have prohibited BTV vaccination (5). Iran reported outbreaks of BT in 2008, and Saudi Arabia reported infection without clinical signs, although the serotype(s) were not identified (5). Multiple serotypes were detected in Israel during 2008 (5) and Oman in 2009 (S. Maan et al., unpub. data). We report characterization of a novel BTV serotype identified in Kuwait in 2010.


full-text:
Novel BTV Serotype, Kuwait | CDC EID


Suggested Citation for this Article
Maan S, Maan NS, Nomikou K, Batten C, Antony F, Belaganahalli MN, et al. Novel bluetongue virus serotype from Kuwait. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2011 May
[date cited]. http://www.cdc.gov/EID/content/17/5/886.htm


DOI: 10.3201/eid1705.101742


Comments to the Authors
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Peter P.C. Mertens, Vector-borne Viral Diseases Programme, Institute for Animal Health, Ash Rd, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF, UK
; email: peter.mertens@bbsrc.ac.uk

Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiae | CDC EID

EID Journal Home > Volume 17, Number 5–May 2011


Volume 17, Number 5–May 2011
Dispatch
Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiae in Ticks, Germany
Cornelia Silaghi, Dietmar Hamel, Claudia Thiel, Kurt Pfister, and Martin Pfeffer

Author affiliations: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany (C. Silaghi, D. Hamel, C.
Thiel, K. Pfister); and Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany (M. Pfeffer)


Suggested citation for this article

Abstract
To explore increased risk for human Rickettsia spp. infection in Germany, we investigated recreational areas and renatured brown coal surface-mining sites (also used for recreation) for the presence of spotted fever group rickettsiae in ticks. R. raoultii (56.7%), R. slovaca (13.3%), and R. helvetica (>13.4%) were detected in the respective tick species
.

Rickettsia species of the spotted fever group are causing emerging infectious diseases (1). Since 1977, Rickettsia slovaca, found in Dermacentor marginatus ticks, was the only known Rickettsia sp. in Germany until 2002, when the following were identified: R. monacensis and R. helvetica in Ixodes ricinus ticks, Rickettsia sp. RpA4 (now R. raoultii) in D. reticulatus ticks, R. felis in Ctenocephalides felis cat fleas, and R. massiliae in I. ricinus ticks (1,2). All of these species cause tick-borne rickettsioses in humans, including tick-borne lymphadenopathy (TIBOLA) (3–7). The aim of this study was to explore the interface between the vector tick and humans by investigating the presence of Rickettsia spp. in ticks at highly frequented recreational areas and renatured brown coal surface-mining sites that also are used for leisure.


full-text:
Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiae | CDC EID


Suggested Citation for this Article
Silaghi C, Hamel D, Thiel C, Pfister K, Pfeffer M. Spotted fever group rickettsiae in ticks, Germany. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2011 May [date cited].

http://www.cdc.gov/EID/content/17/5/890.htm


DOI: 10.3201/eid1705.101445


Comments to the Authors
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Cornelia Silaghi, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Chair of Comparative Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, Leopoldstr. 5, 80802 Munich, Germany
; email: cornelia.silaghi@tropa.vetmed.uni-muenchen.de

Multitarget Test in a Serosurvey of Dogs | CDC EID

EID Journal Home > Volume 17, Number 5–May 2011


Volume 17, Number 5–May 2011
Dispatch
Multitarget Test for Emerging Lyme Disease and Anaplasmosis in a Serosurvey of Dogs, Maine, USA
Peter W. Rand, Eleanor H. Lacombe, Susan P. Elias, Bruce K. Cahill, Charles B. Lubelczyk, and Robert P. Smith, Jr.

Author affiliation: Maine Medical Center Research Institute, South Portland, Maine, USA



Suggested citation for this article

Abstract
To determine if the range of deer ticks in Maine had expanded, we conducted a multitarget serosurvey of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) in 2007. An extension of exposure to Borrelia burgdorferi to the northern border and local transmission of Anaplasma phagocytophilum throughout southern areas was found.


Over the past 2 decades, the range of Ixodes scapularis, the deer tick, vector of Lyme disease, anaplasmosis, babesiosis, and deer tick virus infections, has expanded in northern New England. Because Lyme disease and anaplasmosis affect humans and dogs (Canis lupus familiaris), serosurveys of canids have proved useful for monitoring emergence of these infections. Sample selection may be confounded when dogs that are remotely exposed, vaccinated, or treated with topical acaricides are included. In recent years, however, the advent of a multitarget, in-clinic test kit (SNAP 4Dx; IDEXX Laboratories, Westbrook, ME, USA) has increased the scope and efficiency of these serosurveys. The SNAP 4Dx tests for heartworm antigen and antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Ehrlichia canis on 3 drops of blood. Its sensitivity and specificity for antibodies against B. burgdorferi and A. phagocytophilum exceed 98% (1,2).

In Maine, deer ticks were first reported at a coastal site in 1988 and have since spread inland (3). Lyme disease has become a major public health problem; reported human cases reached 169 per 100,000 population in 1 mid-coastal county in 2008. Human cases of anaplasmosis and babesiosis are also being reported (4). In 1990, we conducted a statewide serosurvey to map B. burgdorferi–positive dogs and to correlate their distribution with reported human cases. Four percent of 828 samples were seropositive for B. burgdorferi, 89% of which were from dogs residing within 20 miles of the coast. No positivity was found among 102 dogs in the northern half of the state (5). Given the widespread acceptance of SNAP 4Dx tests by Maine veterinarians, we resurveyed dogs statewide in 2007 for exposure to B. burgdorferi and A. phagocytophilum. Data from questionnaires to veterinarians and dog owners enabled assessment of the influence of the use of Lyme vaccines and topical acaricides on canine serologic test results.

full-text:
Multitarget Test in a Serosurvey of Dogs | CDC EID


Suggested Citation for this Article
Rand PW, Lacome EH, Elias SP, Cahill BK, Lubelczyk CB, Smith RP. Multitarget test for emerging Lyme disease and anaplasmosis in a serosurvey of dogs, Maine, USA. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet
]. 2011 May [date cited]. http://www.cdc.gov/EID/content/17/5/899.htm


DOI: 10.3201/eid1705.100408

Comments to the Authors
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Peter W. Rand, Vector-borne Disease Laboratory, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, 75 John Roberts Rd, Suite 9B, South Portland, ME 04106, USA
; email: randp@mmc.org

Bartonella spp. in Feral Pigs | CDC EID

EID Journal Home > Volume 17, Number 5–May 2011


Volume 17, Number 5–May 2011
Dispatch
Bartonella spp. in Feral Pigs, Southeastern United States
Adam W. Beard, Ricardo G. Maggi, Suzanne Kennedy-Stoskopf, Natalie A. Cherry, Mark R. Sandfoss, Christopher S. DePerno, and Edward B. Breitschwerdt

Author affiliation: North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA


Suggested citation for this article


Abstract
In conjunction with efforts to assess pathogen exposure in feral pigs from the southeastern United States, we amplified Bartonella henselae, B. koehlerae, and B. vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii from blood samples. Feral pigs may represent a zoonotic risk for hunters or butchers and pose a potential threat to domesticated livestock
.

Bartonella spp. are intravascular, gram-negative bacteria that infect a diverse array of wild and domestic animals. These bacteria appear to induce a wide range of symptoms in humans and can cause similar disease manifestations in animals (1,2). An increasing number of Bartonella spp. are regarded as zoonotic pathogens, which creates a public health concern for human and veterinary medicine (3).

Feral pigs (Sus scrofa), nonnative, ancestral species derived from domesticated pigs in Europe, inhabit 39 states. As their geographic distribution expands and their numbers increase, these animals are causing substantial economic and ecologic damage, which has required implementation of specific damage management programs (4). Hunters and butchers coming in contact with blood from feral pigs may be at risk for infection with Bartonella spp. (3). We report the molecular detection of 3 zoonotic Bartonella spp. in feral pigs harvested by hunters in Johnston County, North Carolina, USA

full-text:
Bartonella spp. in Feral Pigs | CDC EID



Suggested Citation for this Article
Beard AW, Maggi RG, Kennedy-Stoskopf S, Cherry NA, Sandfoss MR, DePerno CS, et al. Bartonella spp. in feral pigs, southeastern United States. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2011 May [date cited].
http://www.cdc.gov/EID/content/17/5/893.htm

DOI: 10.3201/eid1705.100141


Comments to the Authors
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Edward B. Breitschwerdt, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 4700 Hillsborough St, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA
; email: ed_breitschwerdt@ncsu.edu